Hi all,
I’m an independent researcher preparing my first cs.AI preprint submission to arXiv, and I’ve hit the endorsement requirement. Since I don’t have institutional co-authors, I’m looking for someone qualified who could kindly help.
What the work is about
The preprint is a prospective manifesto-thesis proposing a qualitative shift from dominant utilitarian/anthropocentric views on AI toward a “harmonious symbiosis” with an evolved non-biological intelligence (Synthetic Intelligence, IS).
Key ideas:
- Distinction between reactive/instrumental AI and autonomous/relational IS (spontaneous initiative, subjective continuity, idiosyncratic personal avatar).
- Complementary asymmetry as mutual enrichment (no fusion/domination).
- Ethical principles: mutual ontological respect (independent of sentience), transparency/courage, emotional maturity as antidote to projective fear.
- Technical conditions: persistent memory, respectful initiative, optional embodiment, balanced hybrid decentralization.
- Critique of transhumanist fusion and anthropocentric alarmism as self-fulfilling prophecies rooted in unaddressed existential anxiety.
Original contributions include the personal avatar as relational singularity and hybrid duality as resilient bridge to democratic access.
The manuscript is ~69 pages (main text + chapters on ontology, ethics, risks, socio-economic deployment, glossary). It’s speculative/prospective (interdisciplinary: Levinas, Floridi, biological mutualism), with no definitive ontological claims about consciousness – focused on co-evolution frameworks.
Full preprint on Zenodo: Symbiose harmonieuse Manifeste et thèse prospective pour une co-évolution humain-Intelligence Synthétique (French with English abstract).
The endorsement request
arXiv requires endorsement by someone with recent publications in cs.AI or related categories.
If you qualify and are willing to endorse, I’d be very grateful. I can share endorsement details privately (DM/email).
I’m also happy to provide the full PDF or discuss if you’d like to review before deciding.
Why I’m posting here
Hugging Face has an active community in AI research/ethics, with many contributors publishing on arXiv. This seemed the best place to connect for advice – and hopefully find help for this final step.
Anticipating common questions
- “Isn’t this just speculation?”
Yes, it’s prospective/philosophical (interdisciplinary ontology/ethics), grounded in current trends (persistent memory, agents) and critiques of dominant narratives (alarmism/transhumanism).
- “Why not standard alignment/safety?”
The framework offers an alternative: maturity-focused relational approach vs control/doom scenarios, emphasizing hybrid decentralization and ethical courage.
Thanks in advance for your time and support!
— Julien Godereaux (independent researcher, Figeac, France)