Seeking research collaborators: a persistence-first AI architecture, live for 14+ days — help us measure it properly

Hey friends!

We’ve built a persistence-first AI architecture (we call it PPAi — Persistent Presence AI) where a small open LLM (~4.5B) acts only as the language surface, while identity, memory, and cognition live in a continuously-running system — including between turns. We’re testing it in production and looking for researchers interested in this topic.

The problem

We first tried to build a real 24/7 online radio station with LLMs — not “greet listeners between songs,” but news, show continuity, music, listener messages, editing, in two languages. It wasn’t possible. The failure mode was consistent: per-turn context reinjection. Whatever the memory system — full history, summarization, RAG — it breaks down after a few hundred turns, and token consumption grows out of control. In our runs, a naive setup hit the 128K context wall around turn ~917; a RAG setup kept cost flat but we caught it live retrieving one of its own prior hallucinations as a memory. A paid frontier model running the station via API was cut off by the provider (429) in under half an hour.

What’s different

With the PPAi architecture, this is controlled: state is held, not replayed. The live station currently runs at roughly ~44M tokens/day for the whole operation, flat — the equivalent LLM-based setup was trending past 300M/day and climbing when we stopped measuring, because continuing was economically pointless.

The system has been live for weeks, hundreds of thousands of generations, no brain restart, no identity drift observed. You can judge it yourself — it’s on the air right now:

What we’re looking for

This isn’t a hobby project .

We’re looking for researchers motivated by long-horizon persistence: multi-session identity consistency, memory fidelity over 10⁴–10⁵ turns, cost stability, degradation detection. Existing long-memory benchmarks measure retrieval; we think persistence needs its own evaluation framework. The goal is a proper set of measurements and an arXiv paper on the results — whatever they turn out to be.

If this is your topic, comment here or reach out and let’s talk.

Love the idea, love the execution, using a radio station DJ as the platform to perform the research is a great idea!

There are some very smart and helpful people on here, but being the place that it is everyone is working at break neck speeds on their own stuff/helping people etc. This space runs at a crazy speed as you are probably aware, doing what you are doing.

My suggestion is you provide more context and information on your system. Are you planning on keeping the code or idea’s closed sourced or are you open to talking about the methods you use, the ways you test them etc?

The evaluation framework is the perfect idea, if you provide some details or suggestions myself and others much smarter them me will have alot more to go on and you will find a lot of helpful advice.

I personally have projects in this exact area and it is one that I am currently facinated with. So I would love to hear more about your system and your idea’s and see the responses that you get.

Feel free to check out my threads if you like I have many posts about the subject, maybe you can find something in there that can help or spark idea’s etc.