🤖 Discussion on IP optimization scheme for distributed AI data collection

Recently, when building a multimodal model dataset, we encountered IP risk control problems for cross-border collection (especially for sites protected by Cloudflare), and tried three strategies:

Tor network: too high latency (average > 3.2 seconds), unable to meet real-time requirements

Cloud server rotation: AWS/GCP IP segment marking rate increased by 37% month-on-month

Dynamic residential proxy: finally adopted intelligent routing solution, key configuration parameters:

Protocol layer fingerprint obfuscation (simulating Chrome 120+ behavioral characteristics)

Millisecond IP geo-switching (supporting precise positioning of 195+ countries)

Adaptive QPS control (dynamic adjustment based on the anti-climbing strength of the target site)

Measured results (30 days/5 million requests):

Traditional proxy group: success rate 68.7%, triggering verification code rate 19.3%

Optimization scheme group: success rate increased to 98.1%, verification code rate reduced to 0.6%

:warning: Note: It is recommended to use the following strategies to enhance robustness:

Add ±15% random offset to request timestamp

Use headless browser to render key pages

Deploy distributed verification code cracking module

Technical discussion:
How do you handle IP reputation maintenance during large-scale data collection? Is there a mature IP health assessment framework recommended?

(Attached with a sample of technical logs during the test → [non-commercial link] for technical verification reference only)

1 Like