I am making HF a daily stop with my morning Coffee.
I am exploring aspects of AI engineering and Leibniz is “The Man” : A role model for me for sure.
So read along and see what I come up with for Universal Language. I have what Leibniz did not and that is mathematics (of symbols).
Naturally I make use of ChatGPT and do believe this is a place where such usage isn’t frowned on.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: A Man Over a Century Ahead of His Time (AI Language)
In a way, I come to this moment in AI like a wide-eyed child stepping into a vast toy and candy store. The wonder isn’t just in what AI can do—it’s in how it’s engineered, why it works the way it does, and what makes its functioning possible.
So, where does a beginner begin? Naturally, at the beginning—and that means the input.
It’s no mystery that large language models (LLMs) can process any binary pattern: text, sound, or data. But it’s what happens after the input—the transformation of meaningless signals into meaningful structure—that feels like magic. And to guide my reflections as I explore this frontier, I turn to a thinker who, centuries ago, imagined something eerily similar: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.
Leibniz was more than a mathematician. He was a philosopher, linguist, and inventor—the father of the binary number system we still use today. But perhaps his most visionary idea was that of a universal language: the characteristica universalis. It was a symbolic system meant to encode all human knowledge and reasoning. Paired with his proposed calculus ratiocinator, a logical engine for manipulating those symbols, he imagined a future where disputes could be resolved not through debate, but through calculation.
“Let us calculate!” he declared.
Sound familiar? That’s the dream of AI.
In my own journey—especially through my work on Dynamic Unary Objects (DUO)—I’m beginning to see how nature’s patterns lend themselves to symbolic structures. The DUO system, where elements cycle and always sum to an invariant total, feels like a kind of natural language—a pre-tokenized structure waiting for meaning. It makes me wonder: are we catching up to Leibniz’s dream?
He envisioned:
- Characteristica universalis as the symbolic language of thought
- Calculus ratiocinator as the mechanism of computation
Together, they foreshadow symbolic logic, programming languages, and perhaps even the very way AI now turns abstraction into response.
So I ask:
- Is Leibniz the forgotten father of AI language?
- Could structures like DUO—binary-rooted, expressive, and dynamic—be distant descendants of his dream?
Let’s muse under the light of his legacy. And let this be Part One of many, as I explore AI through the eyes of a man centuries ahead of his time.
—Ernst03
Historical Note (A Whisper from the Archives)
While Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is rightly celebrated as the father of binary arithmetic, it’s worth quietly noting that Thomas Harriot, an English mathematician and astronomer, explored binary notation several decades earlier. Harriot’s work remained hidden in unpublished manuscripts until rediscovered in the 1920s—an invisible foundation beneath what Leibniz would later illuminate for the world.
But it was Leibniz who saw beyond the math. He published, he philosophized, and he gave binary its symbolic soul—linking 1 and 0 to the metaphysical dance of existence and nothingness. His vision reached into the future, imagining a universal language built not only for humans, but for reasoning machines.
So while Harriot may have quietly planted the seed, Leibniz gave it light, form, and voice.
I Welcome Conversation