H-Net + Transformer: A New Path Toward True Superintelligence
Modern LLMs, built on Transformer architectures, have reached a remarkable level of fluency—but also a fundamental ceiling.
They operate in a deductive mode: reasoning only within the limits of what was already given in training data.
They can generate, but not learn from what they generate.
Recently, a different idea has emerged—H-Net (Hierarchical Dynamic Chunking / H‑Net++).
Unlike Transformers, H-Net doesn’t rely on tokenization.
It uses a sliding-block mechanism to directly discover semantic structures and patterns from raw signals, forming conceptual hierarchies through induction.
If we see Transformers as logicians, skilled at deduction,
then H-Net behaves like a philosopher, discovering new abstractions from noise.
By combining the two—H-Net for induction, Transformer for deduction—we can form a closed cognitive loop that mimics the human thought process:
Induction → Deduction → Re-induction
In this loop, the Transformer’s generated output feeds back into H-Net, which re-abstracts it into new concepts and integrates it into its semantic network.
This way, the system can learn from its own reasoning, instead of discarding every generation like today’s LLMs do.
Such a system would:
-
Continuously refine its conceptual network.
-
Verify outputs through abstraction consistency.
-
Learn autonomously without human fine-tuning.
It’s a model of “two feet lifting each other”—a possible path toward self-reinforcing, brain-like intelligence.
I’d love to hear what the Hugging Face research community thinks:
Could such an inductive–deductive loop be implemented in practice?
What would be the best way to make H-Net and Transformers communicate efficiently?