Should agent payments be a separate system from human payments?

Most of today’s payment systems, from Stripe to Alipay to crypto wallets, are fundamentally built for humans. They assume a user is present to approve, sign, verify, and complete a transaction.

But if we want autonomous agents to act on behalf of users, especially across the internet or onchain, things break quickly. Agents don’t “click pay,” they don’t pass CAPTCHAs, and they can’t navigate approval flows built for humans. Even crypto wallets today require explicit signatures, which assumes a conscious actor in the loop.

That’s why I’m wondering: should we be thinking of agent payments as a fundamentally different system? One with its own design principles, security assumptions, and UX flows?

Or are we still too early: is it just a subset of the existing payment stack, only needing better APIs and automation wrappers?

Curious how others think about this, especially builders working on agents, task execution, or payment infrastructure.

1 Like

Welcome to posting on Hugging Face @0x0m

That is an interesting question from a philosophical point of view.
I have seen the commercials for Capital One where they ask “What is in Your Wallet?”
For me, I would ask with bot spending, why is my wallet empty and my card maxed out! Perhaps it was a digital romance or digital gambling?
However, your question is one to ask so bravo.

2 Likes